The following is a list of tafsir works. Tafsir is a body of commentary and explication, aimed at explaining the meanings of the Qur’an, tafseer ahsan ul bayan urdu pdf free download central religious text of Islam.

Based on the legal rulings of the Hanafi school of Islamic law. Tafsir al-Baghawi – A popular tafsir amongst Sunni Muslims, it relies heavily on the Tafsir of al-Tha’labi, whilst placing more emphasis on hadith. This Qur’anic commentary is popular in North Africa. Maliki jurist of Cordoba, in Andalusia. Qur’an primarily from the standpoint of Arabic grammar and rhetoric. A summary of the earlier interpretation by al-Tabari.

This commentary, in Arabic, concentrates on the narratives that have been transmitted relating to each verse and subject in the Qur’an. It has been published in six volumes. Also known as Tafsir Abi Sa’ud. A ten-volume Arabic work by the founder of the Hakkiyye Jelveti Sufi Order from Turkey. 8 volume work by a Moroccan Sheikh of the Darqarwi branch of the Shadhili Order of Sufism. The first “full tafsir” attributed to Muqatil ibn Sulayman ibn Bashir al Balkhi. Furat Ibn Furat Ibn Ibrahim al-Kufi.

Usmani by Shaikhu, assessing English Translations of the Qur’an”. Saiid Zaki Hemeidah – elmalılı Tefsir by Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır. Ta’wil” with Frontispiece”. Tanzil wa Asrar al; bayan ul Quran by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi.

By Allama Tabataba’I, explanation of Quranic verses with the help of other relevant verses. English version is available as well. Tafsir E Ashrafi by Shaykh al-Islām Sayad Muhammad Madani Ashrafi Jilani has written a 10 volume Tafsir and its received acclaim by all leading scholars to be the best Urdu Tafsir of this time. It has been specifically been praised for being easy to understand, simple yet effective at the same time.

12 volumes of tafsir written in concise and straightforward languages that is accessible to both mufassir and non-mufassir alike. 06 volumes of tafsir written in 30 years. Many praise it as a modern commentary, but at the same time, many critics including some Sunni scholars say that Qutb had little Islamic knowledge, and wrote his commentary according to his own opinion. It has also been attacked for not following the style of classical commentaries.